The diagnosis billed is not covered for this service.
PR: Patient responsibility. This one goes on the patient statement.
So the balance is billable to the patient, provided your advance notice was in order. Check that before the statement goes out. Billing a patient for something you contractually agreed to absorb is the expensive mistake on this code.
The same code, a different prefix. 167 also arrives as CO 167. The reason for the denial is the same. The prefix decides who pays for it, so the next step is not the same. If your remit says CO 167, read that page instead.
Winnable with a clinician. Recoverable on the merits, but somebody clinical has to attest.
In the order we see it.
The diagnosis billed is not on the payer's covered list for this service.
Check whether a covered diagnosis is documented. If it is, correct the coding. If not, appeal on the merits.
The documentation, not the argument.
The common mistake. Do not change the diagnosis to one that pays. Code what the record supports, and appeal if the record supports coverage.
Where this comes from. This is our own reading of the code, not the payer's and not a copy of the standards text. We classify it from how these denials actually resolve. Where we are unsure, we say so rather than guessing.
The diagnosis billed is not covered for this service. So the balance is billable to the patient, provided your advance notice was in order. Check that before the statement goes out. Billing a patient for something you contractually agreed to absorb is the expensive mistake on this code.
This is our plain-English wording, not the official X12 text. X12 asserts copyright over the published descriptions, so we write our own and say what it means for the money rather than restating the code.
Upload your denial summary for the last 90 days. 4 columns: payer, CARC code, count, billed amount. You get back which were winnable and what they were worth.
Upload your denial export No patient data. No BAA. No charge.
AppealHound